The margins seen at 4K are a little less impressive, but even so the 6800 was still 11% faster than the RTX 3070 and just 14% slower than the 6800 XT and RTX 3080. That means the Radeon is 18% faster than the RTX 3070 and 15% slower than the 6800 XT. Starting with Godfall, the RX 6800 is a mere 3% slower than the RTX 3080, so in this title we're getting 3080-like performance for under $600. We have covered all of that before, and in this review we will test SAM performance when paired with a Ryzen 5000 series CPU.īefore we jump into the blue bar graphs, our GPU test system has been equipped with a Ryzen 9 3950X, 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory running in a dual-channel, dual-rank configuration. The new GPU series also brings with it new features such as ray tracing support, 128MB of AMD Infinity Cache and Smart Access Memory (SAM). With Big Navi, AMD is showing off a new Radeon reference card design which looks significantly better than previous generations. If the RX 6800 XT is going head to head against the RTX 3080, the standard RX 6800 could arrive to compete with the RTX 3070, however going by pricing alone it's clear AMD believes their card will be a tad faster, so it has been priced accordingly. It's rated at 250 watts total board power, and of course, supports PCI Express 4.0. The cores clock at up to 2105 MHz and with 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit wide memory bus, it has 512GB/s of memory bandwidth to play with. The card packs 3840 cores, 240 TMUs and 96 ROPs across 60 CUs. The Radeon RX 6800 is a very similar graphics card and GPU based on the RDNA2 architecture using TSMC's 7nm process. Having reviewed the Radeon RX 6800 XT, today we're checking out the standard RX 6800 which is only ~10% cheaper than the XT at $580, though we're looking at 17% fewer cores, so it'll be interesting to see how the two compare in terms of cost per frame.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |